If Who You Are Is Important to Google, Google Needs to Get it Right

Source: http://www.webpronews.com/google-gets-authors-wrong-2011-08

It seems that Google is messing up a lot lately in terms of attaching the right names to their corresponding content in search results. This is not good, considering that Google seems to be placing a lot more emphasis on who you are.

About two months ago, Google announced authorship markup, which is essentially a way that you can associate specific authors with their content, which is supposed to make it easier for searchers to find content by said author.

This seems to be such a big part of Google’s vision for search that it is the only search feature Google CEO Larry Page mentioned when he was talking about the company’s innovations in search during the conference call for the latest Google earnings report.

“Even in search … which we’ve been working on for 12 years there have never been more important changes to make,” he said. For example this quarter we launched a pilot that shows an author’s name and picture in the search results, making it easier for users to find things from authors they trust.”

That’s all fine and good, but Google seems to be struggling with author names otherwise. Does Google require all publishers on the Internet to make diligent use of this new markup in order to display accurate author names on search results, and otherwise run a high probability of showing false information?

We’ve noticed a couple of Google mistakes with our own articles just within the last few days by accident. There may very well be more, and I’m betting that it’s not just our stuff. For example, here’s Google’s display of a search result for an article by Josh Wolford:

Notice that it lists “Moses Hightower” as the author. This is the name of a fictional character played by actor Bubba Smith, whom Josh mentioned in a different article altogether. Why would this appear as the author’s name for a completely different article (or an article at all for that matter)?

http://seoph2.cafe24.com/wordpress/

Another example shows Google displaying “Selina Kyle” as the author of an article, which was actually written by Jeremy Muncy. Selina Kyle is also a fictional character (Catwoman’s alter ego), which again was not mentioned in this particular article. It was mentioned, however, in another WebProNews article, written again by Josh. Remember, he did not even write the article that Google is displaying this for.

http://seoph2.cafe24.com/wordpress/

Danny Sullivan at Search Engine Land pointed to some screwy results in a recent article as well, but these were in a different element of the search results altogether. He looked at Google’ display of social search results, in which Google was displaying weird names for the people who shared content.

For example, one result, Google said, was shared by TechCrunch writer Jason Kincaid with “Michael Arringtonon on TechCrunch” in parentheses. Another showed Matt Cutts as “Googlewebmastercentral on blogspot.com”. Another showed David Harry as “dannysullivan on sphinn.com”.

Weird.

I don’t know that any of this is related to Google’s authorship markup, but it’s interesting that with Google looking so heavily at WHO is writing content, that it seems to be having trouble determining who is who altogether.

Please visit: SEO Blog

Advertisements

About SEO Updates
I'm an SEO :)

16 Responses to If Who You Are Is Important to Google, Google Needs to Get it Right

  1. Brendon Burchard’s High Performance Academy REVIEW & High Performance Academy BONUS: $$$ GET 25% BACK $$$. Don’t miss this …http://www.ggdao.net/reviews/high-performance-academy-bonus-high-performance-academy-review/

  2. Issac Maez says:

    Cloud Control review by Jason Fielder. I assure you this is a Forex course that you will not want to miss. Check out here the details http://tandaa.com/reviewbonus/cloud-control-trader-bonus-cloud-control-trader-review.html

  3. james j says:

    Aidan Booth will be releasing his latest product which is called Authority Hybrid. read The Authority Hybrid reviews

  4. Paige says:

    I enjoy the efforts you have put in this, thank you for all the great posts.

  5. I simply could not leave your web site prior to suggesting that I really enjoyed the usual information an individual provide for your guests? Is gonna be again steadily to check up on new posts.

  6. Surprisingly illuminating numerous thanks, It looks like your current visitors might possibly want way more well written articles like this carry on the excellent content.

  7. Amelia says:

    I have recently started a site, the information you offer on this site has helped me tremendously. Thank you for all of your time & work. “One of the greatest pains to human nature is the pain of a new idea.” by Walter Bagehot.

  8. Catherine says:

    Somebody necessarily assist to make significantly articles I might state. This is the first time I frequented your web page and so far? I amazed with the analysis you made to make this actual publish extraordinary. Excellent activity!

  9. Great post. I was checking continuously this blog and I’m impressed! Extremely helpful info specially the last part 🙂 I care for such information much. I was looking for this particular information for a very long time. Thank you and best of luck.

  10. very good publish, i certainly love this web site, keep on it

  11. I am often to running a blog and i really respect your content. The article has really peaks my interest. I am going to bookmark your website and preserve checking for brand spanking new information.

  12. Isabella says:

    What i do not understood is in fact how you are now not actually much more smartly-appreciated than you might be now. You are so intelligent. You realize thus considerably in relation to this matter, produced me in my opinion consider it from numerous various angles. Its like women and men aren’t interested unless it is something to do with Lady gaga! Your own stuffs nice. At all times take care of it up!

  13. By no means considered it that way.

  14. Is Google trends a good research site to pinpoint where most of the stupid people live?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: